LATE CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT FOR ESOPHAGEAL PERFORATION BY FOREIGN BODY

HEADINGS:
Foreign bodies; Endoscopy, gastrointestinal; Esophageal perforation

INTRODUCTION

The management of the traumatic perforation of the esophagus constitutes challenging situation, since that is unusual condition; the diagnosis is hindered by the nonspecific or discrete symptomatology and the treatment standardization is also hindered by the variety of the causes and its consequences^3,4,6,10.

Among the causes, the foreign body constitutes about 10% of the cases and the esophageal portion more commonly injured is the thoracic, followed by the cervical and abdominal⁷.

The diagnosis can be firmed by the association of the clinical manifestation and the evaluation by radiological examinations^5,9,10. The high digestive endoscopy can be also used for diagnosis and treatment; however, the delay is associated with the higher morbidity and mortality⁷. Furthermore, because of the individual character of the behavior therapeutic, the choice of a conservative treatment rather than surgical approach is still controversial⁴.

This current report has the aim to identify atypical outcome and to raise alternative conditions for the good management of the esophageal perforation. This report was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital de Urgências de Goiânia, GO, Brazil.

CASE REPORT

A 25-year-old-male was admitted in the Emergency of the Hospital de Urgências de Goiânia with the report of intake of foreign body and its impaction in the upper esophagus with five days of evolution. He was submitted to the higher digestive endoscopy on his hometown with frustrated attempt to remove in the same day of admission. He was hemodynamically stable and afebrile in the moment of his admission, having a normal arterial pressure, having 72 bpm and Sat0₂ 94%. At the hospital, it was done high digestive videoendoscopy, where it was evidenced the presence of foreign body perforating the upper cervical esophagus (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1
High digestive videoendoscopy showing fragment of filiform bone in left lateral esophageal wall and nasogastric tube in the right lateral wall

The foreign body was removed using endoscopic device and, soon after, the patient was submitted to the computed tomography, showing emphysema and perilesional inflammatory process, but absence of collections (Figure 2). The hemogram showed relative and absolute eosinophilia of 18% and 1170/mm³ (reference values: 1-4%, 45-400/mm³), respectively. It was also done thoracic radiography with no alterations.

FIGURE 2
Cervical computed tomography (axial section, with contrasts, venous phase) emphasizing emphysema (long arrows) and perilesional inflammatory process (head of arrow)

The conservative treatment was chosen with nasogastric intubation by endoscopy and antibiotic therapy (intravenous ciprofloxacin 400 mg each 12 h and intravenous metronidazole 500 mg each 8 h) during 10 days and semi-intensive monitoring. It was installed also cervical drain that drained clear liquid and without blood. He had good evolution and was discharged from hospital after 15 days of hospitalization. A month after he was in outpatient care without symptoms or complications

DISCUSSION

It is known that in cases in which the diagnosis and the treatment are started after 24 h from the esophageal injury occurrence - in other words, delayed -, greater complications are related demanding aggressive operations with higher morbimortality^5,7,9.

The diagnostic confirmation of the esophageal perforation can be obtained by the high digestive endoscopy, that can be also used for the purpose therapeutics and by radiological exams with contrasts, as the computed tomography looking for emphysema and perilesional inflammatory process. Impacted sharp objects in the cervical esophagus must be removed by high digestive endoscopy, with success rate in 95%⁸.

Diagnostic done, the treatment is: infection control, nutrition maintenance and injured digestive tract repair with reinforcement suture. However, the procedure for treatment in cases with longer days is removal of the foreign body, no injury suturing, antibiotic therapy and enteral nutrition, similar to this report².

In a Brazilian public hospital⁷ the mortality was smaller in cervical perforation than thoracic and abdominal, as well as statistically significant smaller in patients that received surgical treatment. However, if the esophageal perforation be buffered, with no evidence of sepsis or communication with the pleural or peritoneal cavity, it is recommended fasting, hydration, preferably enteral nutrition support and antibiotic therapy during 14 days¹¹.

The surgery is suitable in cases with wide perisophageal injury, associated to the clinical condition that suggests sepsis, pneumothorax, mediastinal emphysema and respiratory failure. In patients with stable and small injuries there is no demand for immediate surgical repair, but it is recommended intensive monitoring and follow-up by experienced surgeon and radiological exams^1,8,10,11.

REFERENCES

• ¹
  Altorjay A, Kiss J, Voros A. A.15. Nonoperative management of esophageal perforations is it justified? Ann Surg. 1997;225(4):415-21.
• ²
  Andrade AC de, Andrade APS de. A.0. Perfuração de esôfago: análise de 11 casos. Rev Col Bras Cir [Internet]. outubro de 2008 [citado 26 de março de 2015];35(5):292-7. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912008000500004&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt
  » http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912008000500004&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt
• ³
  Andrade-Alegre R. A.6. Surgical treatment of traumatic esophageal perforations: analysis of 10 cases. Clinics [Internet]. outubro de 2005 [citado 26 de março de 2015];60(5):375-80. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322005000500005&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
  » http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322005000500005&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
• ⁴
  Aquino J, Aquino Neto P, Reis Neto J. A.12. Perfuração esofágica. Rev Col Bras Cir. 1986;13(4):125-31.
• ⁵
  Braghetto M I, Rodríguez N A, Csendes J A, Korn B O. A.5. Perforación esofágica: Experiencia clínica y actualización del tema. Rev Med Chil [Internet]. outubro de 2005 [citado 26 de março de 2015];133(10):1233-41. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872005001000014&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=em
  » http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872005001000014&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=em
• ⁶
  Gupta NM, Kaman L. A.4. Personal management of 57 consecutive patients with esophageal perforation. Am J Surg [Internet]. janeiro de 2004 [citado 26 de março de 2015];187(1):58-63. Recuperado de: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14706587
  » http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14706587
• ⁷
  Hasimoto CN, Cataneo C, Eldib R, Thomazi R, Pereira RS de C, Minossi JG, et al. B.0. Efficacy of surgical versus conservative treatment in esophageal perforation: a systematic review of case series studies. Acta Cir Bras [Internet]. abril de 2013 [citado 19 de março de 2015];28(4):266-71. Recuperado de: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23568234
  » http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23568234
• ⁸
  Kroepil F, Schauer M, Raffel AM, Kröpil P, Eisenberger CF, Knoefel WT. G.0. Treatment of early and delayed esophageal perforation. Indian J Surg [Internet]. dezembro de 2013 [citado 19 de março de 2015];75(6):469-72. Recuperado de: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3900754&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
  » http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3900754&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
• ⁹
  Marsico G, Montessi J, Capone D. A.10. Lesões do esôfago. J Bras Med. 1996;71(1):83-90.
• ¹⁰
  Marsico GA, Azevedo DE de, Guimarães CA, Mathias I, Azevedo LG, Machado T. A.7. Perfurações do esôfago. Rev Col Bras Cir [Internet]. junho de 2003 [citado 26 de março de 2015];30(3):216-23. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912003000300009&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt
  » http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912003000300009&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt
• ¹¹
  Vogel SB, Rout WR, Martin TD, Abbitt PL. B.37. Esophageal perforation in adults: aggressive, conservative treatment lowers morbidity and mortality. Ann Surg [Internet]. junho de 2005 [citado 28 de março de 2015];241(6):1016-23. Recuperado de: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1357179&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
  » http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1357179&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract

• Financial source:

  none

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  20 Dec 2019
• Date of issue
  2019

History

• Received
  08 Oct 2018
• Accepted
  20 Aug 2019