ABSTRACT Objectives: To determine agreement in assessing the need for postpartum pharmacological prophylaxis between the scale of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the Colombian guideline scale in a Level IV institution in Bogota, Colombia. Material and methods: Diagnostic agreement study assembled on a cross-sectional study. The included population consisted of pregnant women with 24 or more weeks of pregnancy admitted between March 1 and April 30 of 2021 to a high complexity private institution in Bogotá, Colombia, for labor induction, in active labor, for elective cesarean section, or who required urgent cesarean section. Convenience sampling was used. Measured variables included demographics, risk factors, risk classification and pharmacological prophylaxis according to the two scales. The prevalence of risk factors for each scale was estimated and agreement regarding prophylaxis indication between the two scales was measured using the weighted kappa value. Results: Overall, 320 patients were included. According to the scale of the Royal College Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 54.7 % patients were classified as low risk, 42.5 % as intermediate risk and 2.8 % as high risk. The Colombian scale classified 80 % of patients as low risk, 17.2 % as intermediate risk, 2.2 % as high risk, and 0.6 % as very high risk. The weighted kappa value for agreement regarding the indication was 0.47 (95 % CI: 0.38-0.56). Conclusions: Agreement between the two scales to determine the need for postpartum pharmacological prophylaxis is moderate. Risk classification criteria for the Colombian scale should be validated in a second cohort. Moreover, the predictive ability of the Colombian guideline tool should be assessed at different cut-off points in terms of the consequences of false positive and false negative results.

RESUMEN Objetivos: Establecer la concordancia para evaluar el requerimiento de profilaxis farmacológica en el puerperio entre la escala del Rojal College Obstetricians and Gynaecologists y la escala de la guía colombiana en una institución de cuarto nivel en Bogotá, Colombia. Materiales y métodos: Estudio de concordancia diagnóstica ensamblado sobre un estudio transversal. Se incluyeron mujeres embarazadas con 24 o más semanas de gestación que ingresaron para inducción de trabajo de parto, en trabajo de parto activo, para cesárea electiva, o que requirieron cesárea de urgencia, hospitalizadas entre el 1 de marzo y 30 de abril de 2021 en una institución privada de alta complejidad en Bogotá, Colombia. Se realizó un muestreo por conveniencia. Se midieron variables demográficas, factores de riesgo, clasificación del riesgo y profilaxis farmacológica según las dos escalas. Se calculó la prevalencia de los factores de riesgo por cada escala y la concordancia en la indicación de la profilaxis entre las dos escalas por medio del valor de kappa ponderado. Resultados: Se incluyeron 320 pacientes. La escala del Royal College Obstetricians and Gynaecologists clasificó al 54,7 % de las pacientes en riesgo bajo, riesgo intermedio al 42,5 % y riesgo alto al 2,8 %. La escala colombiana clasificó al 80 % de las pacientes en riesgo bajo, 17,2 % riesgo intermedio, 2,2 % riesgo alto y 0,6 % con riesgo muy alto. El valor kappa ponderado para la concordancia para indicación fue de 0,47 (IC 95 %: 0,38-0,56). Conclusiones: La concordancia de las dos escalas para definir requerimiento de profilaxis farmacológica en el posparto tiene un acuerdo moderado. Se considera es necesario validar los criterios de clasificación del riesgo de la escala colombiana en una segunda cohorte, además evaluar la capacidad predictiva de la herramienta de la guía colombiana en diferentes puntos de corte en términos de las consecuencias de falsos positivos y negativos.

O artigo apresenta o diálogo entre duas etnografias, nas quais a casa é abordada como espaço de produção simbólica. Construído a partir de percursos etnográficos distintos, seu ponto seminal é a multiplicidade de sentidos do habitar para diferentes povos. As casas analisadas se revelaram lugares privilegiados de edificações cujos espaços territorializados apresentam dimensões educativas e patrimoniais plurais dos grupos investigados. Nessa aproximação, a casa/museu Maison du Brésil (residência de pesquisadores brasileiros na França) e a casa tamiriki dos ameríndios katxuyana (às margens do rio Cachorro, Oriximiná, PA) evidenciaram um reforço identitário, tanto para os brasileiros temporariamente morando em Paris, quanto para os katxuyana que regressaram ao seu território. Essas casas também desvelaram reflexões no campo da memória social, ao acionarem lembranças daqueles que as habitam

The article presents the dialogue between two ethnographies, in which the house is approached as a space of symbolic production. Constructed from distinct ethnographic journeys, its seminal point is the multiplicity of meanings of dwelling for different peoples. The analyzed houses proved to be privileged places of buildings whose territorialized spaces present educational and heritage dimensions of the groups investigated. In this approach, the house/museum Maison du Brésil (residence of brazilian researchers in France) and the house tamiriki of the Katxuyana amerindians (on the banks of the river Cachorro, Oriximiná, PA) evidenced the reinforcement of identity for both brazilians temporarily living in Paris, and the Katxuyana who returned to their territory. These houses also revealed reflections in the field of social memory by triggering recollections for those who inhabit them.

Resumo Os museus antropológicos exercem relevante papel na preservação dos patrimônios materiais. Antropólogos, entre outros, contribuem para o colecionamento, documentação, pesquisa e curadoria de exposições sobre diferentes povos e culturas. Nas últimas décadas, cunhou-se a expressão “museologia colaborativa” para expressar uma ação de inclusão e diálogo com remanescentes de povos cujos objetos foram musealizados. Reconfigurando práticas nos museus, tais ações impactaram particularmente as relações entre antropólogos e povos indígenas. Essas experiências dialógicas, em contextos nacionais e internacionais, envolvem antropólogos, profissionais de museus, povos indígenas, museus e coleções. São diferentes processos que apontam para um exercício colaborativo e simétrico entre aqueles que estudam e representam as diferentes culturas e aqueles que as vivenciam cotidianamente. Analisando a literatura sobre o tema, este artigo dialoga com experiências de campo, trazendo dados sobre a “museologia colaborativa” no Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia da UFSC, em Florianópolis, e no Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, em Belém.

Abstract Anthropological museums play a relevant role in the preservation of material heritage. Anthropologists, among others, contribute to the collection, documentation, research and curation of exhibitions on different peoples and cultures. In the last decades, the expression “collaborative museology” has been coined to express an action of inclusion and dialogue with remnants of peoples whose objects have been musealized. By reconfiguring practices in museums, such actions particularly impacted relations between anthropologists and indigenous peoples. These dialogic experiences, in national and international contexts, involve anthropologists, museum professionals, indigenous peoples, museums and collections. They are different processes that point to a collaborative and symmetrical exercise between those who study and represent the different cultures and those who experience them daily. Analyzing the literature on the subject, this article talks with field experiences, bringing data about “collaborative museology” at the Museum of Archeology and Ethnology of UFSC, in Florianópolis, and the Emílio Goeldi Museum in Belém.

O texto apresenta alguns resultados parciais do projeto de pesquisa, ainda em curso, sobre educação patrimonial em Oriximiná/PA, no qual se articulam a experiência de extensão com a pesquisa etnográfica realizada em diversas comunidades locais. O objetivo é o de contribuir para a formação dos professores da rede pública de ensino, como sujeitos pesquisadores, nas comunidades onde atuam, tendo tendo por fim a sua instrumentalização no processo de construção, em conjunto com os alunos, e de práticas educativas interdisciplinares, fortalecida por um olhar sensível ao patrimônio cultural local.

This work presents some partial results of the ongoing research project about heritage education in Oriximiná/PA, in which experiences of community service and ethnographical research carried out in several local communities are combined. Its aim is to contribute to the training of teachers from the public school system as researchers within the communities where they work. In this way, it is expected that the enhanced awareness of local cultural heritage obtained through the research training may enable teachers to contribute to the process of building up, together with the students, interdisciplinary educational practices.